The Greatest Guide To legal agreement case laws
The Greatest Guide To legal agreement case laws
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, Additionally it is a effectively-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, advertising a more informed and just society.
twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons possessing their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature in the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons possessing their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to complete absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Read more
The case addresses An array of issues including, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation with the right to life.
only over the ground of miscases remanded & only around the ground of misreading of evidence only over the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders retaining in view that one of the respondents has retired from service as pointed out with the counsel for your respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more
Section 302 of the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be issue on the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & check here Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally seem, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are subject to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion may very well be deemed, however, we've been crystal clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy topic to the approval in the competent authority.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its possible to secure economic interests and maintain the integrity in the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of such changes is vital for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to enhancing the effectiveness with the legislation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to the determination with the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]